Illustrative · unadmitted fixture
Separate global triggering from hidden external rule selection
- control resource
- mechanism
- experimental
Open problem
Does a non-pair-selective global pulse merely enable local state-dependent dynamics, or do spatial fields and guided intervention select which reconnection occurs?
Why it remains open
Electric pulses and laser-tweezer guidance are reported, but their roles do not establish autonomous local rule choice.
Scope
Mapped field gradients, pulse histories, intervention logs, matched local states, and controls with and without targeted guidance.
Next discriminating criticism or test
Hold the local pair and boundary fixed while randomizing remote field geometry and intervention; predictive dependence on those controls falsifies the claimed local sufficiency.
Explicit non-claims
This topic does not assume global drive is computationally free, uniform, nonselective in practice, or separable from the mechanism.
Exact origins
illustrative-chiral-nematic-interaction-net-conjecture@1· criticizes · illustrative conjecture revision
Search coordinate
Unclassified. No prospective coordinate is published or admitted for this topic.
Typed topic relations
illustrative-global-trigger-versus-external-selection@1complementsillustrative-q8-material-mechanism-experiment@1illustrative-recurring-actuation-fifth-axis@1reclassifiesillustrative-global-trigger-versus-external-selection@1
History and provenance
- Topic
illustrative-global-trigger-versus-external-selection- Revision
- 1
- Authority
- illustrative-unadmitted-fixture
- Canonical admission
- no
- History rows
- 2
- Provenance claims
- 0